Featured Replies
Topics
-
So, a slightly different topic for a change. We talk a lot about the Kodi software, its development and releases, and that's fine, as that's what we're all about and that's what everyone ultimately sees. However, we thought we'd change the subject a little and explore what goes on behind the scenes: how "Team Kodi" is structured, and what else is going on in the background in support of that glorious code. The Kodi Foundation and the Board of Directors Kodi has a legal personality. We're inco
-
Holiday movies often becoming traditions that bring us together with family and friends. Some movies remind us of childhood memories, while others capture the magic and chaos of the holiday season in ways that feel deeply personal. Is there a holiday movie you think is underrated or deserves more attention? What makes a movie feel like a 'holiday movie' to you—does it need to be set during the holidays, or just have the right vibe? In other words, is Die Hard a holiday movie? Do you prefer cla
-
.thumb.png.9925823c85739baf5fceea3bb8e5ca1b.png)
20th Century Studios File Information Submitter MattJacks2003 Submitted 12/17/2024 Category Brands View File -
_(16x9).thumb.png.75789e286d231040adfbb5f43a814c94.png)
CBS Television Distribution File Information Submitter MattJacks2003 Submitted 12/17/2024 Category Brands View File -
Studios USA Television File Information Submitter MattJacks2003 Submitted 12/17/2024 Category Brands View File
View File
Dolby Atmos - Natures Fury 2160p edit
Dolby's "Natures Fury" bumper is a great Atmos audio showcase but visually it was lacking as it is only 1080p and washed out when compared to "Core Universe" which has additional Dolby Vision showcases as well as being in 2160p.
I've taken the higher quality footage from Core Universe and rebuilt Natures Fury while keeping the original Atmos audio intact. Dolby vision has been removed and the video tone mapped to rec 709. Additional AI enhancement was done to bring out a little more detail in the footage.
I find this version preferable to the original not only because of the improved clarity and colours but it also works better for a feature presentation, the original version ends with:
Whereas this edit finishes with: